<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Ehealth, Telehealth and Telemedicine Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://telehealth.net/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://telehealth.net/blog</link>
	<description>Your trusted information and networking source for ehealth, telehealth, home health and telemedicine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:28:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to ID  a New Patient or Client Online? by Dr. Maheu</title>
		<link>http://telehealth.net/blog/id/comment-page-1/#comment-5466</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Maheu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telehealth.net/blog/?p=1587#comment-5466</guid>
		<description>I agree completely, Roy! Thank you for your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely, Roy! Thank you for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Practicing Over State Lines: Licensure Portability Update by Sol Lachman, LCSW-R</title>
		<link>http://telehealth.net/blog/licensure/comment-page-1/#comment-5464</link>
		<dc:creator>Sol Lachman, LCSW-R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telehealth.net/blog/?p=1585#comment-5464</guid>
		<description>The Doc has a good point Evan. Remember the good old days when every doctor was golfing on Wednesdays and psychotherapists took the entire month of August off? But of course, the doctors then also made house-calls...

Additionally, we are moving more and more to an environment where mental health care is under government auspices and a majority of therapists serve in Medicaid-driven, fee-for-service settings. even with the best professional ethics, it&#039;s hard to spend too much time with clients on the phone when it is not billable. 

I am not aware, at this time, of any insurance companies that will pay for sessions not conducted face-to-face. If that is accurate, then distance therapy is strictly for those few who can afford to pay cash.

BTW Doc, not to be picky, but the expression is &quot;BELT &amp; suspenders,&quot; not &quot;best and suspenders.&quot; I trust that it was your word processor &quot;helping you out.&quot;

Curious to know if it is definitely codified in law or state regulation that distance therapy is considered to be happening in the client&#039;s location, and not that of the therapist. Can anyone point me to a link (particularly in NY)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Doc has a good point Evan. Remember the good old days when every doctor was golfing on Wednesdays and psychotherapists took the entire month of August off? But of course, the doctors then also made house-calls&#8230;</p>
<p>Additionally, we are moving more and more to an environment where mental health care is under government auspices and a majority of therapists serve in Medicaid-driven, fee-for-service settings. even with the best professional ethics, it&#8217;s hard to spend too much time with clients on the phone when it is not billable. </p>
<p>I am not aware, at this time, of any insurance companies that will pay for sessions not conducted face-to-face. If that is accurate, then distance therapy is strictly for those few who can afford to pay cash.</p>
<p>BTW Doc, not to be picky, but the expression is &#8220;BELT &amp; suspenders,&#8221; not &#8220;best and suspenders.&#8221; I trust that it was your word processor &#8220;helping you out.&#8221;</p>
<p>Curious to know if it is definitely codified in law or state regulation that distance therapy is considered to be happening in the client&#8217;s location, and not that of the therapist. Can anyone point me to a link (particularly in NY)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to ID  a New Patient or Client Online? by Roy Huggins, MS NCC</title>
		<link>http://telehealth.net/blog/id/comment-page-1/#comment-5349</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Huggins, MS NCC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telehealth.net/blog/?p=1587#comment-5349</guid>
		<description>I definitely agree that we need to be proactive, especially in association with our professional organizations, about pushing our boards regarding license portability and creating official guidelines and rules for distance counseling and other technology-related concerns. I think the important message here is that we need to be talking to each other and cooperating to move forward, yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree that we need to be proactive, especially in association with our professional organizations, about pushing our boards regarding license portability and creating official guidelines and rules for distance counseling and other technology-related concerns. I think the important message here is that we need to be talking to each other and cooperating to move forward, yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to ID  a New Patient or Client Online? by Dr. Maheu</title>
		<link>http://telehealth.net/blog/id/comment-page-1/#comment-5338</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Maheu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telehealth.net/blog/?p=1587#comment-5338</guid>
		<description>Roy, You bring up a good point. One bottleneck might very well be that our systems are indeed slow, but they always have been slow. Nothing is new on that front. 

A more empowered position might be for us to notice that the bottlenecks can also be seen with us practitioners.  We too are slow to fully anticipate the long wait time from licensing boards. And some professional associations are ahead of others in this regard as well. For instance, the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards (ASPPB) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.asppb.net/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3280&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;has a program for us to join&lt;/a&gt; to facilitate licensure mobility, but most psychologists are not involved. 

A further problem is that we tend to work independently, that is, we operate as individuals rather than collectively. Rather, we tend to work alone. We get a call from a needy client, and we take the law into our hands, claiming it would take too long to do it legally. It might not occur to a physician, therapist or counselor to form a group within their state association to push this licensure issue with their state licensing board. That is precisely what needs to happen before we see substantial change, rather than waiting for the &quot;other guy&quot; to make this happen. 

 A little more collective effort could go a long way. I hope you join me in rallying the troops to operate legally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roy, You bring up a good point. One bottleneck might very well be that our systems are indeed slow, but they always have been slow. Nothing is new on that front. </p>
<p>A more empowered position might be for us to notice that the bottlenecks can also be seen with us practitioners.  We too are slow to fully anticipate the long wait time from licensing boards. And some professional associations are ahead of others in this regard as well. For instance, the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards (ASPPB) <a href="http://www.asppb.net/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3280" rel="nofollow">has a program for us to join</a> to facilitate licensure mobility, but most psychologists are not involved. </p>
<p>A further problem is that we tend to work independently, that is, we operate as individuals rather than collectively. Rather, we tend to work alone. We get a call from a needy client, and we take the law into our hands, claiming it would take too long to do it legally. It might not occur to a physician, therapist or counselor to form a group within their state association to push this licensure issue with their state licensing board. That is precisely what needs to happen before we see substantial change, rather than waiting for the &#8220;other guy&#8221; to make this happen. </p>
<p> A little more collective effort could go a long way. I hope you join me in rallying the troops to operate legally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Practicing Over State Lines: Licensure Portability Update by Dr. Maheu</title>
		<link>http://telehealth.net/blog/licensure/comment-page-1/#comment-5337</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Maheu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telehealth.net/blog/?p=1585#comment-5337</guid>
		<description>I have to wonder how many doctors would ~want~ to be accessed by their clients or patients everywhere they go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder how many doctors would ~want~ to be accessed by their clients or patients everywhere they go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

